Slow Down, Speedy

Eyes in the sky are now watching you speed down the eastbound lanes of I-235 between 53rd and Polk. Starting Wednesday, September 28, police will begin issuing tickets for speeds in excess of 10 miles over the limit. Fines are scheduled to be $65 for violations 11-15 miles over the speed limit, $75 for 16-20 miles over, and $80 plus $2 for each mile over 21 mph above the speed limit.

Cameras cover all four lanes, so don't think that you can slide by on the right...

And you had better watch your back driving around the rest of the region as well - there are five additional fixed cameras and one mobile camera placed around Des Moines on a rotating basis. Clive has at least nine on Hickman alone.

View Des Moines Fixed Traffic Camera Locations in a larger map

Despite statements that the cameras are intended to "reduce side impact crashes", it is pretty clear that income is a driving factor (so to speak) in the decision to install these enforcement cameras. Why do I believe this? because they are unmarked. If the intent was truly to reduce crashes and infractions at particularly dangerous intersections, they would be clearly marked with signage at the intersection. Rather there are inconspicuous signs when entering the City - "Photo enforced" on a small white sign on the right shoulder, for example.

By and large, I follow traffic laws. I don't speed, and I am pretty conscious of coming to a complete stop at red lights, so I am not particularly worried about getting tagged. It rubs me the wrong way, however, that the City is disguising what appears to be an income grab at least partially as a public safety measure. It is also disturbing that they outsource enforcement to a private company at a massive profit.

Channel 8 reports that net fixed camera revenues for the first two weeks in September (excluding the I-235 camera) totaled $50,000. Let's say the average citation was $70. That's a whopping 714 citations at five intersections. The private company running the cameras collects $27 per citation, for a gross income of about $38,600 per month or half a million dollars per year (rounding).

The City is poised to collect $800,000 at this rate ($1.3 million in gross revenue less $500,000 paid out to the private camera company). Until I see bright red signs at each monitored intersection, I don't think I'll be convinced that it's about safety over money.


I actually really support this. The speed limit on freeways is designed to keep people generally safe, and people speed down 235 going WAY over the limit. It's dangerous, and that is probably why there is an accident around 63rd nearly every week. I wish they could somehow catch people who are texting while on the freeway too.

Zoe | Sep 27th, 2011 at 9:04 am

Zoe, thanks for reading and commenting! I, too, have big concerns about Interstate speeding, particularly on I-235. It is dangerous and inconsiderate. My problem is utilizing the cameras as revenue generators rather than as tools to improve safety. The only way they can be effective at reducing speeding is if people know about them. Anyone who doesn't know about them will continue to speed until they receive a ticket.

Picture a big red sign saying "WATCH YOUR SPEED! Traffic laws photo enforced next 10 miles". This, in conjunction with the cameras would reduce speeding much more than "hidden" cameras because even people who didn't know that the cameras existed would likely comply.

Otherwise they are simply generating revenue from people who don't know about the cameras and continue to speed. That approach does not reduce speeding as much, but it does generate a lot of money for the City... I'm just saying the lack of signage leads me to believe income is the primary motivator.

DMPerspective | Sep 27th, 2011 at 10:06 am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
This question tests whether you are a human visitor in order to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.